Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breastfeed Med ; 19(4): 262-274, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38535749

RESUMO

Introduction: Despite known benefits of breastfeeding, including prevention against infections for infants, in the presence of numerous barriers, less than half of infants in high-income countries breastfeed for 6 months. One potential barrier to breastfeeding is birth by cesarean section (C-Section), which can invoke long-term difficulties. However, our structured literature review found that existing empirical research does not fully elucidate this relationship due to differences in operationalization of C-section and breastfeeding, omission of important confounders, and failure to exclude those who did not initiate breastfeeding (or use time-to-event analyses). In this article, we attempt to overcome these limitations. Methods: We analyzed data from 14,414 mother-infant dyads enrolled in the United Kingdom-based prospective Millennium Cohort Study, beginning in 2001. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined the association between mode of birth (vaginal, emergency C-section, and elective C-section) and likelihood of breastfeeding initiation. We then applied adjusted Accelerated Failure Time survival models to examine the associations between mode of birth and duration of any and exclusive breastfeeding. Results: Those with planned (but not emergency) C-section were less likely to initiate breastfeeding (odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.99) relative to vaginal births. However, those with either planned or unplanned C-section discontinued both any and exclusive breastfeeding sooner than vaginal births. This effect was more pronounced for those with planned C-section (time ratio [TR]: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.89) than unplanned C-section (TR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97) compared with vaginal births. Conclusions: Through application of rigorous methods, this study provides compelling evidence that breastfeeding duration may be impeded by C-section birth. The findings suggest that additional support for mothers who intend to breastfeed and have a C-section birth may be warranted.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Cesárea , Humanos , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Mães/psicologia , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Lactente , Masculino , Adulto Jovem
2.
JAMA ; 331(8): 702-705, 2024 02 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300534

RESUMO

This study assesses differences in breastfeeding initiation trends between Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participants and WIC-eligible nonparticipants before, during, and after the 2022 infant formula disruption.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Assistência Alimentar , Fórmulas Infantis , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Alimentos Formulados/provisão & distribuição , Fórmulas Infantis/provisão & distribuição , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Birth ; 49(4): 823-832, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35652195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the tenets of rights-based, person-centered maternity care, racialized groups, low-income people, and people who receive Medicaid insurance in the United States experience mistreatment, discrimination, and disrespectful care more often than people with higher income or who identify as white. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the presence of a doula (a person who provides continuous support during childbirth) and respectful care during birth, especially for groups made vulnerable by systemic inequality. METHODS: We used data from 1977 women interviewed in the Listening to Mothers in California survey (2018). Respondents who reported high levels of decision making, support, and communication during childbirth were classified as having "high" respectful care. To examine associations between respectful care and self-reported doula support, we conducted multivariable logistic regressions. Interactions by race/ethnicity and private or Medi-Cal (Medicaid) insurance status were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, we found higher odds of respectful care among women supported by a doula than those without such support (odds ratios [OR]: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-1.8). By race/ethnicity, the association was largest for non-Hispanic Black women (2.7 [1.1-6.7]) and Asian/Pacific Islander women (2.3 [0.9-5.6]). Doula support predicts higher odds of respectful care among women with Medi-Cal (1.8 [1.3-2.5]), but not private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Doula support was associated with high respectful care, particularly for low-income and certain racial/ethnic groups in California. Policies supporting the expansion of doulas for low-income and marginalized groups are consistent with the right to respectful care and may address disparities in maternal experiences.


Assuntos
Doulas , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Gravidez , Humanos , Medicaid , Respeito , Parto Obstétrico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...